[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Any more comments on the whois++ SPKI proposalette?
On Mon, 22 Apr 1996, Jeff Allen wrote:
> Carl Ellison wrote:
> > >6) The SPKI should be useable with at least one standards track directory
> > > protocol.
> > What do you mean by (6)?
> Simon got caught! I think you caught him advocating Whois++ in a
> sneaky way... :)
To be fair (to me :-), I was trying to imply that it must work with
either whois++ or LDAP w/centipede. One might argue that if you can
handle X.509, adding LDAP isn't too much extra work; however the converse
doesn't necessarily apply, so an LDAP oriented solution may not be as
stupid as it sounds, however RFC822/whois++ is simpler for the non DER
They say in online country So which side are you on boys
There is no middle way Which side are you on
You'll either be a Usenet man Which side are you on boys
Or a thug for the CDA Which side are you on?
National Union of Computer Operatives; Hackers, local 37 APL-CPIO