[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SDSI syntax

To: hallam@w3.org
Subject: Re: SDSI syntax
From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
Date: Thu, 2 May 1996 00:27:05 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: spki@c2.org, hallam@w3.org
In-Reply-To: <9605012336.AA12909@zorch.w3.org>
Sender: owner-spki@c2.org

On Wed, 1 May 1996 hallam@w3.org wrote:

> 
> There is a problem however. In my document signature scheme I deliberately used 
> only positive assertions to ensure that the system was monotonic (additional 
> assertions cannot contradict earlier ones). I suspect that Ron chose to avoid 
> negatives for similar reasons.

This doesn't seem to be  a key requirement; getting non-monotonic isn't a 
problem if there are easy ways to break ties; certificates aren't KRS...

Simon

References:

Re: SDSI syntax

From: hallam@w3.org

Prev by Date: SDSI and PGP web of trust
Next by Date: Re: SDSI DNS namespace
Prev by thread: Re: SDSI syntax
Next by thread: Re: SDSI syntax
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread