Re: one possible motivation for X.509 -Reply

To: bjb@trsvr.tr.unisys.com, bjueneman@novell.com, cme@cybercash.com, rsalz@osf.org
Subject: Re: one possible motivation for X.509 -Reply
From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 1996 14:11:39 -0400
Cc: spki@c2.org

Thanks for the frank opinion, Bob, but I'll stand by my claim.  I could
do "classic" 821/822 email without DNS, but it would not be useful.