[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: one possible motivation for X.509 -Reply -Reply

At 11:53 AM 7/19/96 -0600, Bob Jueneman wrote:

>Time will tell, but I think that the fact that we were able to write up a
complete definition
>for the certificate is a very short time, including the non-identity based
features, would 
>indicate that X.509 and ASN.1 really ain't all that bad.

I know this is inviting disaster :) but that very feature of ASN.1 is one I
acknowledge and at the same time blame for ASN.1 disasters.  Maybe we need a
newsgroup for ASN.1 wars.  Let's not do it here.


 - Carl

|Carl M. Ellison          cme@cybercash.com   http://www.clark.net/pub/cme |
|CyberCash, Inc.                              http://www.cybercash.com/    |
|207 Grindall Street           PGP 2.6.2: 61E2DE7FCB9D7984E9C8048BA63221A2 |
|Baltimore MD 21230-4103       T:(410) 727-4288     F:(410)727-4293        |