Mail Index
- Re: SPKI Charter
- From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us>
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- From: "peter (p.w.) whittaker" <pww@bnr.ca>
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- From: "peter (p.w.) whittaker" <pww@bnr.ca>
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- From: "peter (p.w.) whittaker" <pww@bnr.ca>
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- From: "Andrew P. Stevens" <astevens@logicon.com>
- Ye say it's binary data ye be wantin'?
- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
- Re: Ye say it's binary data ye be wantin'?
- From: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee@cybercash.com>
- examples against which to test designs
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Ye say it's binary data ye be wantin'?
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- that cert, once again
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- encodings: do we need binary at all?
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: encodings: do we need binary at all?
- From: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
- Re: Ye say it's binary data ye be wantin'?
- From: Howard Melman <melman@osf.org>
- Re: encodings: do we need binary at all?
- From: lull@acm.org (John Lull)
- Binary vs. ASCII for certificates
- From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
- Re: Ye say it's binary data ye be wantin'?
- From: Brian (ATBD) Beckman <brianbec@microsoft.com>
- Re: Binary vs. ASCII for certificates
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Binary vs. ASCII for certificates
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- key identifiers
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- ASN.1 C++
- From: griffin@vnet.ibm.com
- examples against which to test designs
- From: Tatu Ylonen <ylo@cs.hut.fi>
- Re: encodings: do we need binary at all?
- From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.medford.ma.us>
- ASN.1
- From: griffin@vnet.ibm.com
- Re: ASN.1 C++
- From: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
- Re: encodings: do we need binary at all? -Reply
- From: Ed_Reed@novell.com (Ed Reed)
- Re: Binary vs. ASCII for certificates
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: encodings: do we need binary at all?
- From: "William Allen Simpson" <bsimpson@morningstar.com>
- Re: ASN.1 C++
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: encodings: do we need binary at all?
- From: "marcus (m.d.) leech" <mleech@bnr.ca>
- Re: Binary vs. ASCII for certificates
- From: baos@oss.oss.com (Bancroft Scott)
- going back to stone axes
- From: baos@oss.oss.com (Bancroft Scott)
- Re: encodings: do we need binary at all?
- From: baos@oss.oss.com (Bancroft Scott)
- Re: Binary vs. ASCII for certificates
- From: Greg Rose <Greg_Rose@sydney.sterling.com>
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: Binary vs. ASCII for certificates
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: Duplicate mail
- From: "peter (p.w.) whittaker" <pww@bnr.ca>
- Re: encodings: do we need binary at all?
- From: "marcus (m.d.) leech" <mleech@bnr.ca>
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: baos@oss.oss.com (Bancroft Scott)
- Re: encodings: do we need binary at all?
- From: baos@oss.oss.com (Bancroft Scott)
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- Re: encodings: do we need binary at all?
- From: baos@oss.oss.com (Bancroft Scott)
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- proposed certificate
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Identity certification (was Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI ...)
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- agenda for L.A. BOF
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- From: "William Allen Simpson" <wsimpson@greendragon.com>
- Re: Identity certification (was Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI ...)
- more administrivia: BOF scheduling
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- One view of the transport problem
- From: paf@bunyip.com (Patrik Faltstrom)
- Comments on short-lived certificates in "Generalized Certificates"
- From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
- Re: Identity certification (was Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI ...)
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Comments on short-lived certificates in "Generalized Certificates"
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: encodings: do we need binary at all? -Reply
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: encodings: do we need binary at all? -Reply
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: Binary vs. ASCII for certificates
- From: Jeff Allen <jeff@bunyip.com>
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: "PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM" <PALAMBER@us.oracle.com>
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- From: "marcus (m.d.) leech" <mleech@bnr.ca>
- Re: encodings: do we need binary at all?
- From: "marcus (m.d.) leech" <mleech@bnr.ca>
- what we're about
- From: smb@research.att.com
- No Subject
- From: cman@communities.com (Douglas Barnes)
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
- X.509
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk>
- FW: encodings: do we need binary at all? -Reply
- From: "FreedmanJ" <FreedmanJ@mail.ndhm.gtegsc.com>
- 12000 Lines 'o code?
- From: griffin@vnet.ibm.com
- Re: encodings: do we need binary at all? -Reply
- From: "Graham Finlayson" <graham@amanda.worldtalk.com>
- Re: what we're about
- From: "peter (p.w.) whittaker" <pww@bnr.ca>
- Re: going back to stone axes -Reply
- From: Ed_Reed@novell.com (Ed Reed)
- Re: 12000 Lines 'o code?
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk>
- NULL Distinguished Names
- Re: going back to stone axes
- Re: encodings: do we need binary at all? -Reply
- From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: Michael Richardson <mcr@milkyway.com>
- Reply to Ben and Guillaume
- From: griffin@vnet.ibm.com
- Re: NULL Distinguished Names
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- indexes of certificates
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Identity certification
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: 12000 Lines 'o code?
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: going back to stone axes -Reply
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- 200
- From: griffin@vnet.ibm.com
- Re: Identity certification
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: what we're about
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: encodings: do we need binary at all? -Reply
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk>
- Re: going back to stone axes -Reply -Reply
- From: Ed_Reed@novell.com (Ed Reed)
- Re: what we're about
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- DN as Role NOT Identity
- From: griffin@vnet.ibm.com
- Re: going back to stone axes -Reply
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: 200
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk>
- Re: going back to stone axes -Reply
- From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- brainstorming list of certificate uses
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- some more certificate usages.
- From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: baos@oss.oss.com (Bancroft Scott)
- encodings, character sets, general requirements
- From: Tatu Ylonen <ylo@cs.hut.fi>
- Re: Identity certification
- From: Tatu Ylonen <ylo@cs.hut.fi>
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: Harald.T.Alvestrand@uninett.no
- Re: proposed certificate format
- From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
- Re: going back to stone axes -Reply
- From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
- RE: going back to stone axes
- From: "FreedmanJ" <FreedmanJ@mail.ndhm.gtegsc.com>
- Re: Specification Languages
- From: Joe Tardo <tardo@raptor.com>
- RE: going back to stone axes
- From: "FreedmanJ" <FreedmanJ@mail.ndhm.gtegsc.com>
- Specification Languages
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk>
- re. ASN.1 integers (was Re: proposed certificate format)
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- RE: going back to stone axes
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Specification Languages
- From: "peter (p.w.) whittaker" <pww@bnr.ca>
- Pictures (B. Laurie)
- From: griffin@vnet.ibm.com
- RE: going back to stone axes
- From: baos@oss.oss.com (Bancroft Scott)
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: re. ASN.1 integers (was Re: proposed certificate format)
- From: baos@oss.oss.com (Bancroft Scott)
- Re: some more certificate usages.
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: sanders_james@tandem.com (Jim Sanders)
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Specification languages
- From: "marcus (m.d.) leech" <mleech@bnr.ca>
- Re: Pictures (B. Laurie)
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- RE: going back to stone axes
- From: baos@oss.oss.com (Bancroft Scott)
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: mccoy@communities.com (Jim McCoy)
- Re: some more certificate usages.
- From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
- Re: Specification Languages
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Specification Languages
- From: "PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM" <PALAMBER@us.oracle.com>
- Re: Specification languages
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Specification languages
- From: "marcus (m.d.) leech" <mleech@bnr.ca>
- RE: going back to stone axes
- From: baos@oss.oss.com (Bancroft Scott)
- Re: Specification Languages
- From: Jeff Allen <jeff@bunyip.com>
- Criteria for Specification Languages
- From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- RE: going back to stone axes
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Criteria for Specification Languages
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Criteria for Specification Languages
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- current list of certificate uses
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- owner-spki@c2.org, ietf-pkix@tandem.com
- From: Joe Tardo <tardo@raptor.com>
- Re: current list of certificate uses
- From: Joe Tardo <tardo@raptor.com>
- Aliases (Re-sent)
- From: Joe Tardo <tardo@raptor.com>
- Re: owner-spki@c2.org, ietf-pkix@tandem.com
- From: Joe Tardo <tardo@raptor.com>
- Re: Aliases (Re-sent)
- From: Joe Tardo <tardo@raptor.com>
- Re: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: "Graham Finlayson" <graham@amanda.worldtalk.com>
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: dpkemp@missi.ncsc.mil (David P. Kemp)
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Criteria for Specification Languages
- From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- the problem of loaning of private keys
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- PDDL
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- losing private keys
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: encodings, character sets, general requirements
- From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
- Re: owner-spki@c2.org, ietf-pkix@tandem.com
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Aliases (Re-sent)
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- Re: encodings, character sets, general requirements
- From: azb@llnl.gov (Tony Bartoletti)
- Re: Aliases (Re-sent)
- From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
- "Perry E. Metzger": Re: A brief comparison of email encryption protocols
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: encodings, character sets, general requirements
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- RE: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: "Robichaux, Paul E" <perobich@ingr.com>
- Re: Aliases (Re-sent)
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: dpkemp@missi.ncsc.mil (David P. Kemp)
- Re: encodings, character sets, general requirements
- From: mccoy@communities.com (Jim McCoy)
- Re: Aliases (Re-sent)
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- RE: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: encodings, character sets, general requirements
- From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
- Re: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
- General Requirements (was Re: encodings, character sets, general requirements)
- From: azb@llnl.gov (Tony Bartoletti)
- CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
- automated processing of generalized certificates
- From: Neal.McBurnett@att.com (Neal McBurnett)
- BAN logic
- From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
- Re: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: "PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM" <PALAMBER@us.oracle.com>
- Certs // RW vs CS
- From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- RE: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: Steven Legg <s.legg@trl.telstra.com.au>
- Re: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- PolicyMaker (was RE: Certs // RW vs CS)
- From: "Frank O'Dwyer" <fod@brd.ie>
- RE: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: "Frank O'Dwyer" <fod@brd.ie>
- Re: automated processing of generalized certificates
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Certs // RW vs CS
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- RE: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- [cme@cybercash.com: Re: CRLs versus short Validity periods]
- From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
- [cme@cybercash.com: Re: Certs // RW vs CS]
- From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
- Re: Certs // RW vs CS
- From: "marcus (m.d.) leech" <mleech@bnr.ca>
- Recommended reading: Authentication in Distributed Systems
- From: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
- Web of Trust vs other models
- From: "marcus (m.d.) leech" <mleech@bnr.ca>
- Certificate validity issues
- From: Bruce Zambini <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
- Re: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- ACLs vs. Capabilities
- Re: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
- RE: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: "Robichaux, Paul E" <perobich@ingr.com>
- Re: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: "Frank O'Dwyer" <fod@fws.ilo.dec.com>
- RE: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- RE: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Finding Certificates
- From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- Other ideas for certificates
- From: TCARTER@novell.com (Tammy Carter)
- Re: Other ideas for certificates
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: [cme@cybercash.com: Re: Certs // RW vs CS]
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: ACLs vs. Capabilities
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: owner-spki@c2.org, ietf-pkix@tandem.com
- From: "Patrick Richard" <patr@cyberstore.ca>
- Apology and requirements
- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
- ANSI X9 version of X.509, and Draft Amendment available on request.
- Re: CRLs versus short Validity periods
- From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
- ansi/ccitt doc availability
- From: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
- Re: ANSI X9 version of X.509, and Draft Amendment available on request.
- From: Kevin L Prigge <Kevin.L.Prigge-2@tc.umn.edu>
- Re: Criteria for Specification Languages
- From: Michael Richardson <mcr@achilles.net>
- Re: Apology and requirements
- From: Bruce Zambini <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
- Re: Other ideas for certificates -Reply
- From: TCARTER@novell.com (Tammy Carter)
- bootstrap of key-centric binding of person to key
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- MasterCard and SET (heresay)
- From: Michael Richardson <mcr@achilles.net>
- can CRL's and short-life certs coexist?
- From: Jeff Allen <jeff@bunyip.com>
- Re: bootstrap of key-centric binding of person to key
- From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- Re: can CRL's and short-life certs coexist?
- From: azb@llnl.gov (Tony Bartoletti)
- Re: bootstrap of key-centric binding of person to key
- From: Mark S Feldman <feldman@tis.com>
- Re: bootstrap of key-centric binding of person to key
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: bootstrap of key-centric binding of person to key
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: can CRL's and short-life certs coexist?
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk>
- Re: can CRL's and short-life certs coexist?
- From: "Frank O'Dwyer" <fod@fws.ilo.dec.com>
- Re: bootstrap of key-centric binding of person to key
- From: Mark S Feldman <feldman@tis.com>
- short-life certs vs. CRLs
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Man in the middle attacks
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: bootstrap of key-centric binding of person to key
- From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- Re: Man in the middle attacks
- From: Mark S Feldman <feldman@tis.com>
- Re: Man in the middle attacks
- From: Bruce Zambini <jlasser@rwd.goucher.edu>
- specification language?
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Man in the middle attacks
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: ansi/ccitt doc availability
- Re: specification language?
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- RE: specification language?
- From: "FreedmanJ" <FreedmanJ@mail.ndhm.gtegsc.com>
- Re: specification language?
- From: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <kermit@forthnet.gr>
- Re: specification language?
- From: Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>
- Re: specification language?
- Re: specification language?
- From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
- Re: specification language?
- Re: specification language?
- From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
- Re: specification language?
- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@osf.org>
- Re: specification language?
- I am pleased to announce...
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: specification language?
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: specification language?
- From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- Re: Web of Trust vs other models
- From: Michael Richardson <mcr@achilles.net>
- Re: specification language?
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk>
- Re: specification language?
- From: Andy Brown <a.brown@nexor.co.uk>
- Re: specification language?
- From: "Frank O'Dwyer" <fod@fws.ilo.dec.com>
- RE: ansi/ccitt doc availability
- From: "FreedmanJ" <FreedmanJ@mail.ndhm.gtegsc.com>
- SPKI: E-mail glut
- finding public keys
- From: Martin Hamilton <martin@mrrl.lut.ac.uk>
- Re: Man in the middle attacks
- Re: specification language?
- From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
- Re: specification language?
- From: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
- Re: specification language?
- Re: specification language?
- Re: specification language?
- Certificate Revocation in SET
- From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- Re: specification language?
- From: Simon Spero <ses@tipper.oit.unc.edu>
- Re: Man in the middle attacks
- From: azb@llnl.gov (Tony Bartoletti)
- Re: can CRL's and short-life certs coexist?
- From: azb@llnl.gov (Tony Bartoletti)
- Faking one's own e-suicide vs. putting all eggs in the identity basket (SPKI)
- From: "Frank O'Dwyer" <fod@brd.ie>
- Certificate depreciation & 'fuzzy' verification models (SPKI)
- From: "Frank O'Dwyer" <fod@fws.ilo.dec.com>
- Re: Man in the middle attacks
- From: dpkemp@missi.ncsc.mil (David P. Kemp)
- Re: specification language?
- Bootstrapping Trust in SET
- From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- Re: Certificate depreciation & 'fuzzy' verification models (SPKI)
- From: azb@llnl.gov (Tony Bartoletti)
- Re: losing private keys
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: specification language?
- From: Paul Leach <paulle@microsoft.com>
- Replay Attacks
- From: azb@llnl.gov (Tony Bartoletti)
- Re: Replay Attacks
- From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- Re: losing private keys
- From: dpkemp@missi.ncsc.mil (David P. Kemp)
- Certificate Variability
- From: azb@llnl.gov (Tony Bartoletti)
- Re: specification language?
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Man in the middle attacks
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: specification language?
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Man in the middle attacks
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: can CRL's and short-life certs coexist?
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: specification language?
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: specification language?
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Certificate Variability
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- CYLINK's Support for Open Public Key Standards
- From: jkennedy@netcom.com (John Kennedy)
- Re: CYLINK's Support for Open Public Key Standards
- From: Dave Johnson <dbj@cs.cmu.edu>
- Re: Certificate Variability
- From: azb@llnl.gov (Tony Bartoletti)
- Re: CYLINK's Support for Open Public Key Standards
- Need for Start Date
- From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- No Subject
- From: John Kennedy <jk@cylink.com>
- algorithm licences are forever (*not*)
- From: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>
- 20 questions (was Re: Man in the middle attacks)
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: Need for Start Date
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- A day in the life of ephemeral certificates
- From: "marcus (m.d.) leech" <mleech@bnr.ca>
- Re: A day in the life of ephemeral certificates
- From: azb@llnl.gov (Tony Bartoletti)
- make things as simple as possible
- From: Greg Rose <Greg_Rose@sydney.sterling.com>
- Re: make things as simple as possible
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: make things as simple as possible
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: make things as simple as possible
- From: Greg Rose <Greg_Rose@sydney.sterling.com>
- Is meaning important?
- From: Ben Laurie <ben@gonzo.ben.algroup.co.uk>
- Re: Is meaning important?
- From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
- Staged Certificate Validation
- From: azb@llnl.gov (Tony Bartoletti)
- Re: Is meaning important?
- From: azb@llnl.gov (Tony Bartoletti)
- Re: Is meaning important?
- From: azb@llnl.gov (Tony Bartoletti)
- Re: Staged Certificate Validation
- From: "PALAMBER.US.ORACLE.COM" <PALAMBER@us.oracle.com>
- Re: Staged Certificate Validation
- From: azb@llnl.gov (Tony Bartoletti)
- Re: specification language?
- Re: specification language?
- Re: Need for Start Date
- From: frantz@netcom.com (Bill Frantz)
- Re: Is meaning important?
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- (attribute,key) bindings
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: specification language?
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- uniqueness of X.500 names
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: (attribute,key) bindings
- Re: (attribute,key) bindings
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- SIGNATURE in spki-960705.txt
- From: Richard.Ankney@fisc.com
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: SPKI mailing list and BOF at Los Angeles
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: proposed certificate format
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- encoding rules versus DDLs versus ASN.1
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- RE: going back to stone axes
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
- Re: going back to stone axes
- From: cme@cybercash.com (Carl Ellison)
Mail converted by MHonArc
2.0.0 alpha 2