[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: encodings: do we need binary at all?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

> > I don't think that TLV is necessarily a bad thing, but certainly ASN.1
> >   is an elephantine mess.  Consider that one of its EARLY (ca 1988)
> >   formal specifications is over 400 pages.  Consider the BNF specification
> >   for ANSI C is 6 pages!  The "standard reference text" for ANSI C is,
> >   including the BNF and index, 272 pages.
> 
> X.208 (ASN:1988) is 48 pages.  How did you arrive at 400+ pages?
> 
I was looking at X.209 which granted, isn't just the BNF for ASN.1,
  but the all the other semantic stuff.  Since such standards are
  formal documents, I feel justified in my comparison.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQBVAwUBMTG6vKp9EtiCAjydAQGwpQH/R8ut3eQM0D/ea1DmI+6aOwdM/AIt3DbF
Lx1a6bgtp2ZT3+tAn+jl/LlNVzLdi0MEpnrDqmlEfaxsje1N55yWXQ==
=eQlX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Marcus Leech                   Mail: Dept 4C16, MS 238, CAR
Systems Security Architect     Phone   : (ESN) 395-4901  (613) 763-9145
Systems Security Services      Fax     : (ESN) 393-7679  (613) 763-7679
Nortel Technologies            mleech@bnr.ca
-----------------Expressed opinions are my own, not my employers------

References: