[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: specification language?

Rich Salz writes:
> I thought we killed off this discussion...

Indeed. I would say that the encodings discussion, although
interesting, is a bit premature. Could we hold off on it?


> Java?  Scheme?
> Annotated C, DCE IDL, RSA's "Layman ASN.1" or Sun "rpcgen" input.
> Forget about what works, he said sarcastically.  Oh sure, let's go ahead
> and use something unproven or invent something never before used.  It's
> not as if the mainline problem itself isn't hard enough to solve.
>       /r$

Follow-Ups: References: