[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: specification language?
Rich Salz writes:
> I thought we killed off this discussion...
Indeed. I would say that the encodings discussion, although
interesting, is a bit premature. Could we hold off on it?
> Java? Scheme?
> Annotated C, DCE IDL, RSA's "Layman ASN.1" or Sun "rpcgen" input.
> Forget about what works, he said sarcastically. Oh sure, let's go ahead
> and use something unproven or invent something never before used. It's
> not as if the mainline problem itself isn't hard enough to solve.