Mail Index
Thread Index
1998 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy
From
: Mike Reiter <reiter@research.att.com>
conference/working group on PK infrastructure and trust management ?
From
: Stefan Kelm <kelm@pca.dfn.de>
zero length binary strings
From
: "Michael C. Richardson" <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
base64 encodings
From
: "Michael C. Richardson" <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
[mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca: zero length binary strings]
From
: rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Ron Rivest)
Delegation and Trust Management
From
: David Estevéz Maestre <alumno18@iza.diatel.upm.es>
Re: Delegation and Trust Management
From
: Salvatore Nesta <s.nesta@guest.cnuce.cnr.it>
Re: Delegation and Trust Management
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: base64 encodings
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: Delegation and Trust Management
From
: Hal Finney <hal@rain.org>
Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Bob Smart <Bob.Smart@cmis.CSIRO.AU>
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
RE: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Natarajan Sureshkumar <NatarajS@rnd3.indy.tce.com>
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Bob Smart <Bob.Smart@cmis.CSIRO.AU>
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Hal Finney <hal@rain.org>
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: dpkemp@missi.ncsc.mil (David P. Kemp)
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
non-key-sharing
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
non-repudiation vs. revocation
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: non-repudiation vs. revocation
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: non-key-sharing
From
: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
matter of semantics
From
: jar@ornl.gov
Re: non-key-sharing
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: matter of semantics
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: matter of semantics
From
: Steven Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
ABA Digital Signature Guidelines now available electronically
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Re: non-key-sharing
From
: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
uses of MD5 hashes
From
: "Michael C. Richardson" <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
NO MORE -- Re: Bill of rights, Second Amendment?
From
: Steven Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
Re: non-repudiation vs. revocation
From
: "Camillo Sdrs" <Camillo.Sars@DataFellows.com>
Re: non-key-sharing
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: RE: non-key-sharing
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: non-key-sharing
From
: Ed Gerck <egerck@laser.cps.softex.br>
Re: non-key-sharing
From
: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Re: RE: non-key-sharing
From
: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Re: non-key-sharing
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: matter of semantics
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: non-key-sharing
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: non-key-sharing
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: uses of MD5 hashes
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: non-repudiation vs. revocation
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: non-key-sharing
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: RE: non-key-sharing
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
new web page
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
details for new draft
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
threshold subjects
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Key Signatures Issues - Re: matter of semantics
From
: stewarts@ix.netcom.com
Re: matter of semantics
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: matter of semantics
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: non-key-sharing
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: matter of semantics
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: non-key-sharing
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: matter of semantics
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: uses of MD5 hashes
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: threshold subjects
From
: "Camillo Sdrs" <Camillo.Sars@DataFellows.com>
Re: threshold subjects
From
: David Black <d.black@opengroup.org>
Re: threshold subjects
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
name as identity?
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: Key Signatures Issues - Re: matter of semantics
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: uses of MD5 hashes
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: threshold subjects
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Quick Survey: name certificate syntax
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: name as identity?
From
: Michael Robinson <robinson@public.bta.net.cn>
implementer's survey
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
[cme@cybercash.com: Quick Survey: name certificate syntax]
From
: Ron Rivest <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Re: [cme@cybercash.com: Quick Survey: name certificate syntax]
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: [cme@cybercash.com: Quick Survey: name certificate syntax]
From
: fredette@theory.lcs.mit.edu (Matt Fredette)
Re: name as identity?
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
The Carl & Bob show
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: The Carl & Bob show
From
: jar@ornl.gov
Re: The Carl & Bob show
From
: Ed Gerck <egerck@laser.cps.softex.br>
Re: The Carl & Bob show
From
: "Camillo Sdrs" <Camillo.Sars@DataFellows.com>
Re: The Carl & Bob show
From
: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Re: [cme@cybercash.com: Quick Survey: name certificate syntax]
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: The Carl & Bob show
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: The Carl & Bob show
From
: "Brian M. Thomas" <bt0008@entropy.sbc.com>
Re: implementer's survey
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
RE: The Carl & Bob show
From
: Peter Whittaker <pww@entrust.com>
Re: RE: The Carl & Bob show
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: The Carl & Bob show
From
: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Re: The Carl & Bob show
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
new drafts submitted today
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
six-page binary format draft (was: Quick Survey: name certificate syntax)
From
: Tatu Ylonen <ylo@ssh.fi>
Re: The Carl & Bob show
From
: George Ross <gdmr@dcs.ed.ac.uk>
Re: six-page binary format draft (was: Quick Survey: name certificate syntax)
From
: "Camillo Sdrs" <Camillo.Sars@DataFellows.com>
Re: six-page binary format draft
From
: Alan Barrett <apb@iafrica.com>
Re: six-page binary format draft (was: Quick Survey: name certificate syntax)
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
re. date format
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: six-page binary format draft
From
: Paul Leyland <pcl@sable.ox.ac.uk>
Re: re. date format
From
: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
time resolution (was Re: six-page binary format draft)
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: time resolution (was Re: six-page binary format draft)
From
: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee@cybercash.com>
Re: time resolution (was Re: six-page binary format draft)
From
: "John Pettitt" <jpp@cybersource.com>
Re: time resolution (was Re: six-page binary format draft)
From
: Tony Bartoletti <azb@llnl.gov>
Re: time resolution (was Re: six-page binary format draft)
From
: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xcert.com>
Re: re. date format
From
: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us>
Re: time resolution (was Re: six-page binary format draft)
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: re. date format
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: date format
From
: "Camillo Sdrs" <Camillo.Sars@DataFellows.com>
Re: re. date format
From
: "Alain Zahm" <zahm@sophia.sema.fr>
Re: time resolution (was Re: six-page binary format draft)
From
: Paul Leyland <pcl@sable.ox.ac.uk>
six-page binary format draft
From
: Tatu Ylonen <ylo@ssh.fi>
Lasr RFC dratf comments
From
: serret <serret@tele.ucl.ac.be>
Re: time resolution (was Re: six-page binary format draft)
From
: Steven Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
Re: time resolution (was Re: six-page binary format draft)
From
: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
Re: time resolution (was Re: six-page binary format draft)
From
: "Alain Zahm" <zahm@sophia.sema.fr>
time and date
From
: Zooko Journeyman <zooko@xs4all.nl>
Re: time and date
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: time and date
From
: Paul Leyland <pcl@sable.ox.ac.uk>
Re: time resolution (was Re: six-page binary format draft)
From
: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Re: re. date format
From
: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@orchard.arlington.ma.us>
Re: time and date
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: re. date format
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Name spaces for secret keys?
From
: Ron Rivest <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>
Re: Name spaces for secret keys?
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: re. date format
From
: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Re: time and date
From
: "Camillo Sdrs" <Camillo.Sars@DataFellows.com>
Re: time resolution (was Re: six-page binary format draft)
From
: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
Re: Lasr RFC dratf comments
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: Lasr RFC dratf comments
From
: Xavier Serret <serret@tele.ucl.ac.be>
three digital signature models ... for x9.59
From
: Lynn.Wheeler@firstdata.com
Re: three digital signature models ... for x9.59
From
: "Phillip M. Hallam-Baker" <hallam@ai.mit.edu>
Re: three digital signature models ... for x9.59
From
: Lynn.Wheeler@firstdata.com
Re: three digital signature models ... for x9.59
From
: "Phillip M. Hallam-Baker" <hallam@ai.mit.edu>
Re: three digital signature models ... for x9.59
From
: Lynn.Wheeler@firstdata.com
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-spki-cert-structure-03.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ns.ietf.org
Re: time resolution (was Re: six-page binary format draft)
From
: Steven Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>
Re: three digital signature models ... for x9.59
From
: Lynn.Wheeler@firstdata.com
Re: time and date
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: three digital signature models ... for x9.59
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: three digital signature models ... for x9.59
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: three digital signature models ... for x9.59
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: three digital signature models ... for x9.59
From
: Lynn.Wheeler@firstdata.com
Re: three digital signature models ... for x9.59
From
: Lynn.Wheeler@firstdata.com
Re: time and date
From
: Vinnie Moscaritolo <vinnie@pgp.com>
Re: Lasr RFC dratf comments
From
: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xcert.com>
Certs draft
From
: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xcert.com>
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-spki-cert-theory-00.txt
From
: Ed Gerck <egerck@laser.cps.softex.br>
Re: three digital signature models ... for x9.59
From
: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-spki-cert-theory-00.txt
From
: Xavier Serret <serret@tele.ucl.ac.be>
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-spki-cert-theory-00.txt
From
: Ed Gerck <egerck@laser.cps.softex.br>
Re: three digital signature models ... for x9.59
From
: Lynn.Wheeler@firstdata.com
Re: time and date
From
: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-spki-cert-theory-00.txt
From
: "Patrick C. Richard" <patr@xcert.com>
global names are a security flaw
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: global names are a security flaw
From
: Ed Gerck <egerck@laser.cps.softex.br>
Adding Certified NTP as a possible standard for portable trust in networking systems
From
: Todd Glassey <Todd.Glassey@mail.coastek.com>
Re: DN naming conventions and schema
From
: Ed Gerck <egerck@laser.cps.softex.br>
Re: global names are a security flaw
From
: Bill Buffam <bjb@trsvr.tr.unisys.com>
Re: global names are a security flaw
From
: Ed Gerck <egerck@laser.cps.softex.br>
Re: global names are a security flaw
From
: Bill Buffam <bjb@trsvr.tr.unisys.com>
I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-spki-cert-examples-00.txt
From
: Internet-Drafts@ns.ietf.org
Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-spki-cert-examples-00.txt
From
: Ed Gerck <egerck@laser.cps.softex.br>
Re: global names are a security flaw
From
: Ed Gerck <egerck@laser.cps.softex.br>
Re: global names are a security flaw
From
: "Camillo Sdrs" <Camillo.Sars@DataFellows.com>
Re: global names are a security flaw
From
: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>
RE: The Carl & Bob show
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: RE: The Carl & Bob show
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
PGP web of trust
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: PGP web of trust
From
: Ed Gerck <egerck@laser.cps.softex.br>
Re: PGP web of trust
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: DN naming conventions and schema
From
: "Patrick C. Richard" <patr@xcert.com>
No Subject
From
: Ed Gerck <egerck@laser.cps.softex.br>
Re:
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Private Key replacement
From
: Francesco Zambon <zambon@enidata.it>
Closed loop paths of trust
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: Private Key replacement
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Out on a loop
From
: Ed Gerck <egerck@laser.cps.softex.br>
Re: Private Key replacement
From
: "Camillo Sdrs" <Camillo.Sars@DataFellows.com>
Re: Out on a loop
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
electricity (was Re: Out on a loop)
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: Private Key replacement
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: global names are a security flaw
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: global names are a security flaw
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: global names are a security flaw
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: global names are a security flaw
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: global names are a security flaw
From
: Ed Gerck <egerck@laser.cps.softex.br>
Re: Private Key replacement
From
: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
delegation question
From
: "Stephen C. Koehler" <koehler@securecomputing.com>
Re: delegation question
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: delegation question
From
: "Michael C. Richardson" <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: delegation question
From
: "Michael C. Richardson" <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Re: delegation question
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: Out on a loop
From
: dpkemp@missi.ncsc.mil (David P. Kemp)
Re: Out on a loop
From
: "Derrell D. Piper" <ddp@network-alchemy.com>
Re: delegation question
From
: "Stephen C. Koehler" <koehler@securecomputing.com>
Re: delegation question
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
NSSAPKAAICAMS
From
: Bob Jueneman <BJUENEMAN@novell.com>
Re: Out on a loop
From
: Ed Gerck <egerck@laser.cps.softex.br>
PKI Thesis
From
: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@xcert.com>
Re: Out on a loop
From
: Nick Szabo <szabo@best.com>
Re: Out on a loop
From
: Curtis Yarvin <Curtis_Yarvin@geoworks.com>
Re: Out on a loop
From
: dpkemp@missi.ncsc.mil (David P. Kemp)
Re: Validity periods can be handled more explicitly
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
RE: The Carl & Bob show
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: RE: The Carl & Bob show
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: PGP web of trust
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re:
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: Out on a loop
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
electricity (was Re: Out on a loop)
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: Private Key replacement
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: global names are a security flaw
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: global names are a security flaw
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: global names are a security flaw
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: global names are a security flaw
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Re: delegation question
From
: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Mail converted by
MHonArc
2.0.0 alpha 2