[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
>>If you would just call it the "Public Key Authorization Protocol", and
>>stop referring to it as "a radical departure from X.509" or otherwise
>>comparing it to PKI mechanisms, a lot of confusion would be avoided.
>>You bring this upon yourself by using the words "Infrastructure" and
>>"Certificate" instead of more descriptive terms like "Authorization"
>I think this is a very astute comment. I had a similar reaction when this
>(and SDSI) were first gelling in my mind. I wonder if we really are
>confusion here. I think it's potentially very powerful, but I don't think
>it's acurately characterized as a public key infrastructure either. Isn't
>very nature more like anti-infrastructure?
Maybe we should call spki the not-so-simple, archane public key
authorization anti-infrastructure chowder and marching society? :-)
Just kidding (I think).