[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: single <auth> per cert (was Re: "auth" --> "tag" ?? )
On Apr 2, Bryce <email@example.com> wrote:
> Hm. It still seems to me that the natural thing to do, in
> keeping with the SPKI precepts, is to declare that there are no
> global meanings of tags, that trying to _make_ global meanings of
> tags is going to get you into a can of worms, and that you can
> accomplish what you want anyway by using local meanings of tags.
I'd ditto this... is this a sort of parallel to the SDSI claim that there
is no (useful) global namespace? It seems to me a common-sense extension
of that philosophy.
Jon Lasser (410)433-7495 firstname.lastname@example.org
http://www.goucher.edu/~jlasser/ PGP key = 1024/EC001E4D
"Flap your ears, Dumbo! The feather was only a trick!"