[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: majordomo information

To: perry@piermont.com
Subject: Re: majordomo information
From: Hallam-Baker <hallam@ai.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 3 Apr 1997 10:57:13 -0500 (EST)
Cc: peter@verisign.com, spki@c2.net
In-Reply-To: <199704030526.AAA29083@jekyll.piermont.com> from "Perry E. Metzger" at Apr 3, 97 00:26:31 am
Sender: owner-spki@c2.net

> Peter Williams writes:
> > When the WG charter, presented in that memo, calls out "encrypted email"
> > does this literally preclude "Signed email", as per PGP say, 
> > in the charter and scope?
> 
> Only to the extraordinarily literal minded.

Which is exactly what you want when developing a computer
system specification.

Wellcome Peter! Why on earth would you think people would
object to your input?

	Phill

References:

Re: majordomo information

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>

Prev by Date: Global name spaces for tags
Next by Date: Re: Certificate Cancellation Notice
Prev by thread: Re: majordomo information
Next by thread: Re: Typeability and screen space
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread