[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Canonical form for signing S-expressions
> Given these requirements and considerations, I have heard no technical
> arguments against the following proposal, and I suggest we go with it.
> -- represent all byte strings "verbatim" as e.g.
> with #,hexadecimal length,colon,byte-string
> (Using this format gives maximum efficiency for long byte strings.)
> -- represent lists with parentheses
> -- use no spaces to separate elements, and no fragmentation of
> byte strings.
> Example: The S-expression
> (a b (cd e fgh))
> has canonical form for signing
Sounds good to me.