[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: propagation control

To: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Subject: Re: propagation control
From: "Angelos D. Keromytis" <angelos@dsl.cis.upenn.edu>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 1997 17:00:28 +0100
Cc: spki@c2.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 21 Apr 1997 01:23:52 EDT." <3.0.1.32.19970421012352.00f93498@cybercash.com>
Sender: owner-spki@c2.net

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


In message <3.0.1.32.19970421012352.00f93498@cybercash.com>, Carl Ellison write
s:
>
>By contrast, we could have just the keyword
>
>(propagate)  meaning the true sense and leave it out if we want the false 
>sense, since this is boolean otherwise.

I like this better, because it's simple and its implications are
well-understood.
- -Angelos

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBM1vVbL0pBjh2h1kFAQElswP9EY0cvk7R1YYsG1HBYeUM/4cn5uFXBDNU
DDp4rcPLeiZMDuWjjxJDYUT9TmYdVp2rVkgnTrMnYG5rwE6pcGvIZZMl23zZfcFI
Z6nXmxPHZ7vYnmvbkgcpxuGuDm9Bd1+Bm2Zk6X7SMgj2Ffq4+DT+uu8N/hznuqzM
9QShs2G51aM=
=QVDG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

References:

propagation control

From: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>

Prev by Date: Re: non-contiguous validity times
Next by Date: Re: Linkology proposal for SPKI/SDSI
Prev by thread: Re: propagation control
Next by thread: Re: propagation control
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread