[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: SPKI getting something done would be nice....
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In message <33A5E1AA.68C52798@verisign.com>, Peter Williams writes:
>Why is it undesirable to use a "MIME/PGP-signed bodypart"
>as an SPKI cert? (which is what I suggested)?
I suppose you are aware that the 'S' in SPKI stands for "Simple". I
can't imagine an SPKI library having a MIME encoder/decoder...
- -Angelos
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface
iQCVAwUBM6YCbL0pBjh2h1kFAQHGbgP/a23foRGs84juxBBnWp7ZLz62ZzBJxXjc
b+pO/ZwdOzm7Hg5YCzhPEvsmJaRgdWkUWScXRPlrtYNyRMbSfJMUeLM9KJrGDYKI
NP7XdpgqnAPMqLAPtyaGtkYTpSEuPzgHD6RnR8SIIrhuwMW0CLw8qn5WnO42JlcJ
6S/sBPZH0xQ=
=v4ts
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Follow-Ups:
References: