[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: multiple certification rules
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 04:21 PM 6/15/97 +1000, Bob Smart wrote:
>Either way it seems that public key infrastructure should only
>cover signing keys. Mixing in other sorts of keys into that infrastructure
>is unnecessary and confusing. Or maybe I'm missing something?
I concur completely as do the other authors of the SPKI draft, I believe.
- Carl
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBM6rHlFQXJENzYr45AQH8vAQAk1ZQYYqqhzb3lZcd23RlBq5mw7IngPHY
AJfoiWB3vvlvv4CWjbjgsJbBLuE4b1wW0nMf4n9aggSBrlrxljKHMIpHSDsdSzW5
ZUhS5aNHTRn37Y95dShfxzcKWocgNFatYdfv+/sh73zPaI6UDo2vqK2YoB6j/N91
hNQBvDKMHJg=
=xZEN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Carl M. Ellison cme@cybercash.com http://www.clark.net/pub/cme |
|CyberCash, Inc. http://www.cybercash.com/ |
|207 Grindall Street PGP 2.6.2: 61E2DE7FCB9D7984E9C8048BA63221A2 |
|Baltimore MD 21230-4103 T:(410) 727-4288 F:(410)727-4293 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
Follow-Ups: