[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: non-id certs +++
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 08:03 AM 6/26/97 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
>In the case of a bank wishing to try to claim nonrepudiation, as
>mentioned previously, it would seem sensible for them to refuse certs
>that are not self-signed.
The cert doesn't have to be self-signed. All the bank needs is a signed
receipt -- a separate digital document (maybe a kind of cert with subject and
issuer reversed?) -- but a matter of process. Let's leave it at that.
- Carl
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBM7Lby1QXJENzYr45AQEiXgP/fob+v8lqq8eDFd42we9z+FLQ+C+prwEv
29t5Ab9bQS3+pJJ1IjNwKZ/mP16OtUpP3zdvfNOwgllpCJvAQO0KzckAkD4kcq3l
lta+imjPzEMEhm/YFiwPfqgGjgBo482EtB2fMx1BPtrFqUEdkxRYAIq7mjO76RF2
XPzILWWS0D4=
=BkPq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Carl M. Ellison cme@cybercash.com http://www.clark.net/pub/cme |
|CyberCash, Inc. http://www.cybercash.com/ |
|207 Grindall Street PGP 2.6.2: 61E2DE7FCB9D7984E9C8048BA63221A2 |
|Baltimore MD 21230-4103 T:(410) 727-4288 F:(410)727-4293 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
References: