Re: SPKI signing keys only (errata)

["William Allen Simpson" <wsimpson@greendragon.com>]

> From: dpkemp@missi.ncsc.mil (David P. Kemp)
> I wrote:
> >
> > "key establishment" was my made-up term to refer to any public key based
> > process which results in a session key, including transport and agreement.
>
> Actually, I didn't make up that term, I subliminally remembered
> Definition 1.63 from "Handbook of Applied Cryptography".
>
> It's always easier to communicate when everyone uses a common,
> generally-agreed-upon language.
>
Found it.  OTOH, I don't find this "Handbook" particularly easy to
remember, and was rather disappointed in it, for twice the price of
Schneier.  Schneier is a lot more like the good old handbooks from
ARRL and the classic CRC "Handbook of Chemistry and Physics".

I keep the Schneier next to the machine, and the Menezes on the shelf in
the library (in another room).

Anyway, are we agreed in general to use the terminology in Menezes?

WSimpson@UMich.edu
    Key fingerprint =  17 40 5E 67 15 6F 31 26  DD 0D B9 9B 6A 15 2C 32
BSimpson@MorningStar.com
    Key fingerprint =  2E 07 23 03 C5 62 70 D3  59 B1 4F 5E 1D C2 C1 A2

---

• Prev by Date: Re: legal question about certs
• Next by Date: Re: SPKI signing keys only
• Prev by thread: Re: SPKI signing keys only (errata)
• Next by thread: Re: Unsubscribing from spki@c2.net
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread