[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IETF spki meeting minutes

To: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Subject: Re: IETF spki meeting minutes
From: Tatu Ylonen <ylo@ssh.fi>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 1997 02:40:17 +0300 (EET DST)
Cc: spki@c2.net
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19970814192115.00a455d0@cybercash.com>
Organization: SSH Communications Security, Finland
References: <199708141532.RAA03936@smb.research.att.com><3.0.3.32.19970814192115.00a455d0@cybercash.com>

Just to clarify, I strongly have the opinion that SDSI names should be
in SPKI.  I did list that as one of the big areas of complexity in the
meeting, but I really don't think that should be removed.  That is one
of the big wins we get with SPKI.

    Tatu

References:

IETF spki meeting minutes

From: Steve Bellovin <smb@research.att.com>

Re: IETF spki meeting minutes

From: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>

Prev by Date: Re: IETF spki meeting minutes
Next by Date: Re: IETF spki meeting minutes
Next by thread: Re: Subject signing redux (was: Re: Mary is Mary)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread