[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IETF spki meeting minutes



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 04:58 PM 8/14/97 -0500, Brian M. Thomas wrote:
>I had never actually envisioned that [*-form reduction] logic
>making its way into the standard for certificates themselves; it seems
>a natural place to break into another, later, specification.  It is
>clearly needed, but does it need to be in a cert format specification?

I was reacting to the group from Memphis which considered the spec 
incomplete without the full 5-tuple reduction logic.

I agree that it should probably be split off.  I've had that comment from 
too many independent sources.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv

iQCVAwUBM/OX/lQXJENzYr45AQFpkgP/Th4rR0uaI2YGxawZP9OtNG0swT0YyXlf
h02TSdg+lDQAOV3VyaMZEY3XKbk4FFSYvd1g/T4aCZ8aSJk5V93mZdhMAZ6Tnq9Y
ccATeyyIV6YtYuDnLhu43w1CfmpB6iW3kmEnCPulLD4kV5+ykV0S4mNvIDb5AJNe
gOYVt7lvKqg=
=DDx4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Carl M. Ellison  cme@cybercash.com   http://www.clark.net/pub/cme |
|CyberCash, Inc.                      http://www.cybercash.com/    |
|207 Grindall Street   PGP 2.6.2: 61E2DE7FCB9D7984E9C8048BA63221A2 |
|Baltimore MD 21230-4103  T:(410) 727-4288  F:(410)727-4293        |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+


References: