[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

yet another <auth> type

To: spki@c2.net
Subject: yet another <auth> type
From: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 06:41:14 -0500
Sender: owner-spki@c2.net

It makes sense to issue an SPKI cert for the statement:

"The subject keyholder (K1) is the same person as the keyholder of (K2), on 
<date>."

This allows someone to start a service by which someone can map old keys to 
new ones.

Thoughts?

 - Carl


+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Carl M. Ellison  cme@cybercash.com   http://www.clark.net/pub/cme |
|CyberCash, Inc.                      http://www.cybercash.com/    |
|207 Grindall Street   PGP 2.6.2: 61E2DE7FCB9D7984E9C8048BA63221A2 |
|Baltimore MD 21230-4103  T:(410) 727-4288  F:(410)727-4293        |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+

Follow-Ups:

Re: yet another <auth> type

From: Moltar Ramone <jlasser@goucher.edu>

Re: yet another <auth> type

From: Marc Branchaud <marcnarc@zoo.net>

Re: yet another <auth> type

From: Bill Stewart <stewarts@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: DCSB: Online Government & Electronic Commerce - Legislation andPublic Sector Initiatives
Next by Date: Re: yet another <auth> type
Prev by thread: DCSB: Online Government & Electronic Commerce - Legislation andPublic Sector Initiatives
Next by thread: Re: yet another <auth> type
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread