[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: <auth> parameter field names?
At 11:11 AM 3/24/97 -0800, Bill Frantz wrote:
>I think named parameters grow better with the inevitable specification
>changes that occur over time.
The draft which I submitted this a.m. (-01.txt) uses S-expression format (in
a move to get compatible with SDSI) and with S-expressions a parameter can
be either a token (and therefore positionally determined) or an S-expression
and therefore labelled. I proposed in the draft allowing designers of new
<auth> fields to choose their own method of definition.
With luck the draft will be avbl shortly.
- Carl
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Carl M. Ellison cme@cybercash.com http://www.clark.net/pub/cme |
|CyberCash, Inc. http://www.cybercash.com/ |
|207 Grindall Street PGP 2.6.2: 61E2DE7FCB9D7984E9C8048BA63221A2 |
|Baltimore MD 21230-4103 T:(410) 727-4288 F:(410)727-4293 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
References: