[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

auth global uniqueness

To: spki@c2.net
Subject: auth global uniqueness
From: Bryce <bryce@digicash.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 1997 20:52:25 +0200
Reply-To: bryce@digicash.com
Sender: owner-spki@c2.net


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hm.  Forgive me if this is a newbie question that you have
already all hashed out, but why do we have the random-name
kludge to ensure "<auth>" name global uniqueness instead of
saying that the auth name is relative to the issuer?


Regards,

Zooko Journeyman

I am not a cypherpunk.  NOT speaking for DigiCash or any other
person or organization.  PGP sig follows



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i
Comment: Auto-signed under Unix with 'BAP' Easy-PGP v1.1b2

iQB1AwUBM0ACuEjbHy8sKZitAQES9gMAs8hKW02YAJ5GpkeuQ/6ZjBzLhdU5gtW1
OhdtltTu1s5oBvHwjysQezc59UxnJYaqLriEss9U8o03SG8oJ55UiHeWvVcmAREk
3H0ftm1aniO5FmMJbE3as1AVtYAEXQd6
=WxNP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Follow-Ups:

Re: auth global uniqueness

From: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>

Prev by Date: Multiple subjects and auths
Next by Date: Auth
Prev by thread: Re: Multiple subjects and auths
Next by thread: Re: auth global uniqueness
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread