[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Is there a business for CAs?

To: Ed Gerck <egerck@laser.cps.softex.br>
Subject: Re: Is there a business for CAs?
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 1998 16:02:50 -0400
cc: SPKI <spki@c2.net>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 10 Apr 1998 14:24:18 -0300." <Pine.LNX.3.95.980410141923.491V-100000@laser.cps.softex.br>
Reply-To: perry@piermont.com
Sender: owner-spki@c2.net


As much as I might agree with the contents of this, I think the
general topic is no longer relevant to the SPKI mailing list.

Ed Gerck writes:
> 
> This question was raised last week and discussed in e-carm.
> 
> It's often said that a good lawyer should be able to argue both sides
> of an issue... Though I am not a lawyer, I believe it is instructive
> to see things from all perspectives. 
> 
> I don't know if this may be a duplicate posting to some, but my
> answer below may help see things from the CA side and does not
> contain any exaggeration -- so it may be useful here. A CA investor
> should seriously consider the items I analyse below as free advice --
> as well as CA users and security protocol work groups. 
[...]

References:

Is there a business for CAs?

From: Ed Gerck <egerck@laser.cps.softex.br>

Prev by Date: RE: Is there a business for CAs?
Next by Date: RE: Is there a business for CAs?
Prev by thread: RE: Is there a business for CAs?
Next by thread: Revocation, etc...
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread