[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Display types?

To: spki@c2.net
Subject: Re: Display types?
From: Jon Callas <jcallas@nai.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 1999 14:44:48 -0800
In-Reply-To: <36ED6A83.4FA83893@research.bell-labs.com>
References: <199903151518.KAA16272@swan.lcs.mit.edu>
Sender: owner-spki@c2.net

The UTF-8 definition is RFC 2279. You can find it at
<ftp://ftp.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc2279.txt>.

I also agree that if the only real need for display types is for non-latin
glyphs, we're better served by the ISO 10646 character set and its UTF-8
representation than display types. The IETF already requires that text be
in UTF-8.

	Jon



-----
Jon Callas                                  jon@pgp.com
CTO, Total Network Security                 3965 Freedom Circle
Network Associates, Inc.                    Santa Clara, CA 95054
(408) 346-5860                              
Fingerprints: D1EC 3C51 FCB1 67F8 4345 4A04 7DF9 C2E6 F129 27A9 (DSS)
              665B 797F 37D1 C240 53AC 6D87 3A60 4628           (RSA)

References:

Display types?

From: Ron Rivest <rivest@theory.lcs.mit.edu>

Re: Display types?

From: Eric Grosse <ehg@research.bell-labs.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Display types?
Next by Date: Re: Display types?
Prev by thread: Re: Display types?
Next by thread: Re: Display types?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread