To: Jim McCoy From: Carl Ellison Subject: Re: Subject signing redux (was: Re: Mary is Mary) Cc: spki@c2.net Bcc: X-Attachments: In-Reply-To: <3.0.2.32.19970625121054.008d23f0@mail.communities.com> References: <199706251415.KAA02626@argon.ncsc.mil> X-Eudora-Signature: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- At 12:10 PM 6/25/97 -0700, Jim McCoy wrote: >>The attack is "framing Mary". > >"Jon said X" >"Did not." >"Did too." > >We couldn't solve these problems in childhood when they first appeared There are contracts which require signatures by two parties. Those multiple signatures don't have to be on any particular certificate. It may be that what we've learned from centuries of law is that any signed legal document probably needs to be signed by all parties to the document. Each would have an appropriate certificate loop backing up the signature. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 5.0 Charset: noconv iQCVAwUBM7F8W1QXJENzYr45AQFiFQQAsCtjc7e0bxVhEdMg2qimSdBV/hYJhJGB ycCymHvhiz3KICBITK0we11+Zm6sQVspffIYvZjr2g0C+HkAwRdWKCcO4vOJpB0Q ahuB/qiYDrSueJh8S8+pyh55otG8pVjvEfXh8i/A6nrQLzTodXk/PLgtF2vEylo/ uzSYTxvlCIA= =cmpz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----