From owner-spki@c2.net Fri Feb 19 01:45:43 1999 Received: from blacklodge.c2.net (blacklodge.c2.net [140.174.185.245]) by lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA09212; Fri, 19 Feb 1999 01:45:40 -0500 (EST) Received: (from majordom@localhost) by blacklodge.c2.net (8.8.8/8.7.3) id VAA10570 for spki-outgoing; Thu, 18 Feb 1999 21:54:47 -0800 (PST) X-Sender: frantz@netcom4.netcom.com Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <87ww1hbzoa.fsf@hedonism.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Thu, 18 Feb 1999 21:31:48 -0700 To: Paul Crowley , spki@c2.net From: Bill Frantz Subject: Re: MIT implementation sources? Sender: owner-spki@c2.net Precedence: bulk At 6:13 PM -0700 2/16/99, Paul Crowley wrote: >Does anyone know of an FTP site outside the USA that carries the SDSI >2.0 sources, and whether I'd be breaking any laws in fetching them >from there if so? I'd also be particularly interested in hearing >about any complete examples of SPKI-enabled clients and servers that >use this code, particularly if they're also SSL based. I'm interested >in using SPKI as the basic permissions system for the next major >revision of PRCS (http://www.xcf.berkeley.edu/~jmacd/prcs) which is >client-server and SSL based. My reading of the latest Wasenaar (sp?) agreement is that authentication only systems are completely de-controlled. As such, unless you are in one of the 5 really bad guy countries, export/import is completely legal. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | Macintosh: Didn't do every-| Periwinkle -- Consulting (408)356-8506 | thing right, but did know | 16345 Englewood Ave. frantz@netcom.com | the century would end. | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA