[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: IPv4 Security



Ted,

You're right. I shouldn't have included a phrase like that in a list of 
requirements.  I should have merely stated the requirement as: 

"* Flexibility to support growth to different protocol profiles (e.g., IP:TNG,
CLNP, etc)"

And then we focus on defining just what profiles we care to provide support for.

Jim Zmuda