[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (IPng) Re: Proposed message on perfect forward security

To: ipng@sunroof.eng.sun.com
Subject: Re: (IPng) Re: Proposed message on perfect forward security
From: bound@zk3.dec.com
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 95 00:44:34 -0500
Cc: Danny.Nessett@eng.sun.com, hinden@servo.ipsilon.com, ipsec@ans.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 15 Mar 95 19:00:47 +0500." <9503160000.AA22457@dcl.MIT.EDU>

Ted,

>Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 19:00:47 +0500
>From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@MIT.EDU>

>Well, that suggests one possible compromise --- which is that draft is
>modified to remove the comment deprecating in-band keying, but also
>stating that the intention is that the expectation is that the base
>level key exchange method will be using an out-of-band key exchange
>method.  

>Is this something that everyone can live with?

Yes regarding the subject/topic of keying in the specs. This states the
base key exchange method and does not mention others that may develop.
This will let competition exist which IMHO is OK for any proposed
standard evolution, and in fact good.  

/jim

Prev by Date: Re: (IPng) Re: Proposed message on perfect forward security
Next by Date: Re: (IPng) More Endpoint Attributes
Prev by thread: Re: (IPng) Re: Proposed message on perfect forward security
Next by thread: Re: (IPng) Re: Proposed message on perfect forward security
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread