[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bellovin's attack and others like it

To: Hilarie Orman <ho@cs.arizona.edu>
Subject: Re: Bellovin's attack and others like it
From: pau@watson.ibm.com (Pau-Chen Cheng)
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 95 16:48:42 -0500
Cc: rubin@mgoblue.bellcore.com, ipsec@ans.net
In-Reply-To: (Your message of Tue, 11 Apr 95 12:09:54 MST.) <199504111910.AA17458@interlock.ans.net>


Hilarie, when you say "two layers", do you mean a new transport layer
protocol (other than TCP, UDP, ICMP, ...) ?


Regards, Pau-Chen

> We put two layers side-by-side over the basic packet delivery
> services.  One layer is for non-key traffic, the other layer consists
> of only the key management protocol.
>
> I favor this arrangement over schemes that use UDP for key management,
> because I believe it yields a cleaner separation of software functionality
> and is easier to analyze.

References:

Re: Bellovin's attack and others like it

From: Hilarie Orman <ho@cs.arizona.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Bellovin's attack and others like it
Next by Date: Re: Bellovin's attack and others like it
Prev by thread: Re: Bellovin's attack and others like it
Next by thread: Re: Bellovin's attack and others like it
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread