[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Grouping SAs (was Re: How many algorithms per SA/Transform?)

To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
Subject: Re: Grouping SAs (was Re: How many algorithms per SA/Transform?)
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@apollo.hp.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 1997 13:35:10 -0500
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: mcr's message of Fri, 07 Mar 1997 09:55:35 +0200. <199703070756.JAA04190@morden.ssh.fi>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

>     Norman> How about just "Security Bundle" or "Security Package"?
> 
>   Uh... "policy" ??

Too high level; in my mind, "policy" would cover things like "I need
to encrypt all packets sent outside the LAN and authenticated all
packets inbound from outside the LAN..".

'SA bundle' sounds good to me since "security association" has been
defined to be something more low level..

					- Bill

References:

Re: Grouping SAs (was Re: How many algorithms per SA/Transform?)

From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: question about draft semantics
Next by Date: Re: Grouping SAs (was Re: How many algorithms per SA/Transform?)
Next by thread: Re: TO COMPRESS OR NOT TO CMPRS (please reply)
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread