[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What price security?

To: perry@piermont.com, dpkemp@missi.ncsc.mil (David P. Kemp)
Subject: Re: What price security?
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 14:25:56 -0400
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <199706201545.LAA14643@jekyll.piermont.com>
References: <Your message of "Fri, 20 Jun 1997 09:28:26 EDT." <199706201328.JAA17227@argon.ncsc.mil>
Reply-To: rgm3@chrysler.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

At 11:45 AM 6/20/97 -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
>Of course, one of the advantages of the Internet architecture is that
>routers generally aren't communications endpoints (they are, but only
>for a tiny amount of management traffic) so they generally aren't
>going to be doing much encryption. It is only endpoint hosts with
>gigabit speed networks that need to worry, and those are (currently)
>rare, and probably by the time they are common processors will be
>substantially faster.

For many the router is the gateway.  Talk to Cisco and Ascend on that.  And
also look at Redcreek.


Robert Moskowitz
Chrysler Corporation
(810) 758-8212

Follow-Ups:

Re: What price security?

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>

References:

Re: What price security?

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>

Prev by Date: Re: What price security?
Next by Date: Announcement from the new IPsec chairs
Next by thread: Re: New draft -- IPSEC AH
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread