[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ISAKMP encryption choices?

To: "Todd D. Ellner" <tellner@cs.pdx.edu>
Subject: Re: ISAKMP encryption choices?
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 14:50:57 -0400
cc: Rodney Thayer <rodney@sabletech.com>, ipsec@tis.com
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 20 Jun 1997 11:35:20 PDT." <199706201835.LAA03809@sirius.cs.pdx.edu>
Reply-To: perry@piermont.com
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

"Todd D. Ellner" writes:
> Given the recent events in the Senate this entire discussion
> may soon become moot. The Kerrey/McCain bill (SB909) has
> REPLACED ProCODE as of last night.

And it isn't going to pass -- not by a long shot.

If it does, well, I suppose most of the rest of the world isn't going
to care what we stupid Americans do. The IETF is an international
organization. We don't build standards for the U.S. only.

Perry

References:

Re: ISAKMP encryption choices?

From: "Todd D. Ellner" <tellner@cs.pdx.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: What price security?
Next by Date: Re: What price security?
Prev by thread: Re: ISAKMP encryption choices?
Next by thread: Re: ISAKMP encryption choices?
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread