[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: What price security?

To: rgm3@chrysler.com
Subject: Re: What price security?
From: andrade@netcom.com (Andrade Software Andrade Networking)
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 1997 11:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: karn@Qualcomm.com, dpkemp@missi.ncsc.mil, ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19970620143631.00a29c30@dilbert.is.chrysler.com> from "Robert Moskowitz" at Jun 20, 97 02:36:31 pm
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

Andrade Software & Networking
Andrad@Netcom.Com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 829       

Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> 
> At 09:23 AM 6/20/97 -0700, Phil Karn wrote:
> >>Nonetheless, there are applications (such as gigabit routers) where the
> >>processor-to-bandwidth ratio is smaller than pentium-over-modem.
> >
> >Which, IMHO, is yet another compelling argument for doing encryption
> >on an end-to-end basis whenever possible.
> 
> And those servers better gear up for some hefty crypto work!
> 

Take a look at the May/June IEEE Network magazine.  The 1st article
by Roger Needham, "The Changing Environment for Security Protocols",
is quite thought provoking.  I think these technological and
organizational trends he discusses will be incorporated into the 
future design of cryptographic protocols.

- Alex

-- 

Alex Alten
P.O. Box 11406
Pleasanton, CA  94588
USA

Andrade@Netcom.Com
(510) 417-0159   Fax/Voice

References:

Re: What price security?

From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm3@chrysler.com>

Prev by Date: Re: What price security?
Next by Date: DES futile?
Next by thread: Re: New draft -- IPSEC AH
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread