[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Unnecessarily bloated IV calculation

To: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Unnecessarily bloated IV calculation
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 1998 09:32:28 -0500
Cc: ipsec@tis.com
In-Reply-To: <199802100103.RAA17086@dharkins-ss20.cisco.com>
References: <Your message of "Mon, 09 Feb 1998 17:18:09 EST." <199802092218.RAA08119@carp.morningstar.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

At 05:03 PM 2/9/98 -0800, Daniel Harkins wrote:
>
>Just for the record, one of the things I've been waiting on was a simple,
>generic CBC-MAC paper that a certain vocal I-O resolution document critic
>had promised to write so I could reference it. Alas, it never materialized
>and we'll just have to live without it.

Actually, there was an ID on this.  It is part of IPsecond, as it did not
gather strong backing at Munich.


Robert Moskowitz
ICSA
Security Interest EMail: rgm-sec@htt-consult.com

Follow-Ups:

Re: Unnecessarily bloated IV calculation

From: Ben Rogers <ben@Ascend.COM>

References:

Re: Unnecessarily bloated IV calculation

From: Daniel Harkins <dharkins@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: L2TP + IPSEC question
Next by Date: Re: Unnecessarily bloated IV calculation
Next by thread: Re: IPSEC and NFS
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread