[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Please review draft-ietf-pppext-l2tp-sec-03.txt

To: <rgm-sec@htt-consult.com>
Subject: Re: Please review draft-ietf-pppext-l2tp-sec-03.txt
From: Charles Kunzinger <kunzinge@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 1998 15:08:12 -0500
Cc: <ipsec@tis.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@ex.tis.com

Bob,

Did you steer us to the right draft?  "Draft-ietf-pppext-l2tp-sec-03.txt"
seems
to only cover the case where IPSec is not available.   There is  a different
draft, "Securing L2TP using IPSec" (draft-ietf-pppext-l2tp-security-01.txt),
that may be more relevant, since it discusses several examples of how IPSec
would be applied to a set of representative L2TP-based configurations.

I'll try to post some comments on the draft  "Securing L2TP using IPSec" draft
later today.

____________________________
Charles A Kunzinger (kunzinge@us.ibm.com)
TCP/IP Technology Management, JDGA/501, RTP
Phone: Tieline 8-444-4142 ,  External 1-919-254-4142
Fax: Tieline 8-444-6243,  External 1-919-254-6243
VM:  IBMUSM27(KUNZINGE)

Prev by Date: Re: is manual keying mandatory
Next by Date: Last Call: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol to Proposed Standard
Prev by thread: Re: Please review draft-ietf-pppext-l2tp-sec-03.txt
Next by thread: Re: Please review draft-ietf-pppext-l2tp-sec-03.txt
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread