[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Dangling SA Summary (final comments???)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott G. Kelly [mailto:skelly@redcreek.com]
> Sent: June 22, 1999 12:01 PM
> To: Tim Jenkins
> Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
> Subject: Re: Dangling SA Summary (final comments???)
>
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> > Tim Jenkins wrote:
> >
> <trimmed...>
> > Also, obviously, I'm going to have to update the re-keying
> document to
> > reflect the fact that systems are free to have dangling phase 2 SAs.
> > However, I must insist that implementations are also free to have
> > multiple phase 1 SAs with peers so that they can choose not to have
> > dangling phase 2 SAs.
>
> I must be missing something here - I am under the impression that
> implementations have *always* been free to have multiple phase 1 SAs
> with peers. Am I misunderstanding your post?
>
> Scott
>
Not at all. I just wanted to make sure that it was clear. I think that there
is much too much that is either implicit or not specified in these
documents; this is one of those things that I think should stated somewhere.
So, it's going into the re-keying document... (Well, that part is already
there.)