[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: signture mode and non-repudiation

To: "Mason, Shane" <smason@blockade.com>
Subject: RE: signture mode and non-repudiation
From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 1999 13:24:02 -0500
Cc: "'Hugo Krawczyk'" <hugo@ee.technion.ac.il>, francisco_corella@hp.com, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: <60A30A0BD275D211B8F1006097E4728523BD69@mailgw.blockade.com>
References: <60A30A0BD275D211B8F1006097E4728523BD69@mailgw.blockade.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Shane,

>I am definately missing something.  When is repudiability (deniability_
>useful?  If I have an encrypted connection with someone, why would I want to
>allow someone to be able to muck with the data stream without my knowledge?
>
  NR is subtly different from user or data authentication and data 
integrity.  I suggest you look at the recent I-D security terminology 
glossary published by Rob Shirey, as a starting point.

Steve

References:

RE: signture mode and non-repudiation

From: "Mason, Shane" <smason@blockade.com>

Prev by Date: RE: signture mode and non-repudiation
Next by Date: Re: signture mode and non-repudiation
Prev by thread: Re: signture mode and non-repudiation
Next by thread: RE: signture mode and non-repudiation
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread