[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ike and secure DNS

To: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
Subject: Re: ike and secure DNS
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:27:05 -0400
Cc: warlord@mit.edu (Derek Atkins), hugo@ee.technion.ac.il (Hugo Krawczyk), henry@spsystems.net (Henry Spencer), ipsec@lists.tislabs.com (ipsec)
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

In message <200010111521.IAA25142@zed.isi.edu>, Bill Manning writes:
>% My point is that the records of who owns (or has the delegation for, if 
>% you prefer) address blocks are not very good.  Why sign something that 
>% isn't correct to start with?
>% 
>% 		--Steve Bellovin
>
>What is the source of your concern?  That the various RIR whois data is 
>inaccurate? Or that the delegations themselves are "busted", ie. no working
>servers?

The former is the main issue.

		--Steve Bellovin

Follow-Ups:

Re: ike and secure DNS

From: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>

Prev by Date: Re: ike and secure DNS
Next by Date: Re: ike and secure DNS
Prev by thread: Re: ike and secure DNS
Next by thread: Re: ike and secure DNS
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread