[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: charter question re IKE changes

To: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com, "Chinna N.R. Pellacuru" <pcn@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: charter question re IKE changes
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@research.solidum.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 21:08:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 16 Oct 2000 12:14:03 PDT." <Pine.GSO.4.10.10010161122300.17187-100000@zipper.cisco.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com


>>>>> "Chinna" == Chinna N R Pellacuru <pcn@cisco.com> writes:
    Chinna> A common scenario these days in the silicon valley: a corporation got
    Chinna> acquired by another, and the network administrators are tasked with
    Chinna> connecting the two intranets ASAP. Pre-shared keys can be used to setup a
    Chinna> tunnel quickly (or the public keys can be manually exchanged). If

  This is only true if you are comparing against some poorly designed CA
product. Go try someone else's product before you base your decisions on poor
design decisions in your own product.

  Exchanging self-signed certificates can be done with *less* hassle than
pre-shared keys. 

   :!mcr!:            |  Solidum Systems Corporation, http://www.solidum.com
   Michael Richardson |For a better connected world,where data flows faster<tm>
 Personal: http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/People/Michael_Richardson/Bio.html
	mailto:mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca	mailto:mcr@solidum.com

Follow-Ups:

Re: charter question re IKE changes

From: "Chinna N.R. Pellacuru" <pcn@cisco.com>

References:

RE: charter question re IKE changes

From: "Chinna N.R. Pellacuru" <pcn@cisco.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Getting focus for son-of-IKE
Next by Date: RE: charter question re IKE changes
Prev by thread: RE: charter question re IKE changes
Next by thread: Re: charter question re IKE changes
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread