[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Position statement on IKE development

To: "Horn, Mike" <mhorn@virtela.net>
Subject: Re: Position statement on IKE development
From: Bill Sommerfeld <sommerfeld@East.Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2001 20:41:01 -0400
cc: "'Theodore Tso'" <tytso@mit.edu>, Andrew Krywaniuk <andrew.krywaniuk@alcatel.com>, "'Alex Alten'" <Alten@home.com>, "'Marcus Leech'" <mleech@nortelnetworks.com>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com, ietf-ipsra@vpnc.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 Aug 2001 18:03:08 MDT." <CCFF88268143CC4181A758DCC0ECDC13DE773D@posthaus.virtela.cc>
Reply-to: sommerfeld@East.Sun.COM
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

> One of the reasons various user authentication schemes have not been
> considered (CRACK for instance) is the moratorium on changes to IKE.
> Unfortunately the IPSRA WG is very dependent on IKE.  

The IPSRA WG is not at all dependant on IKE; it's really all about
protocols to turn legacy authentication into certificates..

					- Bill

Prev by Date: Re: Re draft-kaufman-ipsec-improveike-00.txt
Next by Date: Re: IKE must have no Heirs
Prev by thread: Re: Position statement on IKE development
Next by thread: RE: Position statement on IKE development
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread