[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Position statement on IKE development

To: "Mason, David" <David_Mason@nai.com>
Subject: Re: Position statement on IKE development
From: Derek Atkins <warlord@mit.edu>
Date: 07 Aug 2001 08:25:03 -0400
Cc: "'Marcus Leech'" <mleech@nortelnetworks.com>, ietf-ipsra@vpnc.org, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com, "'jis@mit.edu'" <jis@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: "Mason, David"'s message of "Mon, 6 Aug 2001 12:28:04 -0700"
References: <8894CA1F87A5D411BD24009027EE7838128231@ROC-76-204.nai.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

They never were included in the moratorium.

-derek

"Mason, David" <David_Mason@nai.com> writes:

> Is it true that the NAT traversal IKE and IPsec changes have been exempted
> from the moratorium?
> -dave

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord@MIT.EDU                        PGP key available

References:

RE: Position statement on IKE development

From: "Mason, David" <David_Mason@nai.com>

Prev by Date: Position of certificate payload in IKE Aggressive Mode as Initiator
Next by Date: Re: IKE must have no Heirs
Prev by thread: Re: Position statement on IKE development
Next by thread: Re: Position statement on IKE development
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread