[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Wes Hardaker: opportunistic encryption deployment problems

To: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>
Subject: RE: Wes Hardaker: opportunistic encryption deployment problems
From: Michael Thomas <mat@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 14:20:46 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>, Hugh Daniel <hugh@road.xisp.net>, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSI.3.91.1010807160125.25170C-100000@spsystems.net>
References: <2F3EC696EAEED311BB2D009027C3F4F40154CA4B@vhqpostal.verisign.com><Pine.BSI.3.91.1010807160125.25170C-100000@spsystems.net>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

Henry Spencer writes:
 > On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
 > > I would not rely on any outcome being achieved as a byproduct of 
 > > DNSSEC...
 > 
 > In other words, we can't ever rely on DNS being secure?  Come now.
 > Admittedly, there are obstacles between here and there, but it is still
 > the right solution for a number of problems.

   This strikes me as saying that the only obstacle to
   star travel is the speed of light...

	       Mike

References:

RE: Wes Hardaker: opportunistic encryption deployment problems

From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>

RE: Wes Hardaker: opportunistic encryption deployment problems

From: Henry Spencer <henry@spsystems.net>

Prev by Date: VPN subnet mask
Next by Date: RE: Wes Hardaker: opportunistic encryption deployment problems
Prev by thread: RE: Wes Hardaker: opportunistic encryption deployment problems
Next by thread: RE: Wes Hardaker: opportunistic encryption deployment problems
Index(es):
- Main
- Thread