[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IPSec still too slow?
Dan,
LOL. You need to re-read the archives to get your facts straight.
I've been very clear about my concerns with IPsec prior to that,
starting with a detailed response to the last call 3 years ago.
- Alex
At 12:01 PM 10/9/2001 -0700, dharkins@lounge.org wrote:
> Alex,
>
> Since all you do is spread FUD you shouldn't be surprised that someone
>would get nasty. Your agenda is quite obvious, you've had it in for IPsec
>ever since your product was described on this list as snake-oil.
>
> Dan.
>
>"I personally think it is very dangerous to organize
> referendums when you're not sure to win them"
> -- Louis Michel, President of the European Union
>
>On Fri, 05 Oct 2001 16:15:40 PDT you wrote
>> Dr. John Ioannidis,
>>
>> I have a great deal of respect for your contributions to the Internet
>> community. This kind of nasty response greatly surprises me and indicates
>> to me that the problems with IPSec are very serious. I did not take these
>> numbers at face value. That is why I requested confirmation. However,
>> the fact of the matter is, IPSec will always be at least 10x behind the
>> communications price/performance curve. You, of all people, know that.
>> And you know that fact will eventually kill off IPSec.
>>
>> - Alex
>>
>>
>> At 03:27 PM 10/5/2001 -0400, ji@research.att.com wrote:
>> >People who do not understand how to take and interpret performance
>> >measurements should just shut up.
>> >
>> >/ji
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Alex Alten
>> Alten@Home.Com
>>
>> ***********************
>> * Just Say NO to RC4. *
>> ***********************
>
--
Alex Alten
Alten@Home.Com
Follow-Ups:
References: