[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [saag] Re:
At 10:53 AM 5/25/02 -0400, RJ Atkinson wrote:
>Hmm. I would rather say that RSVP is hop-by-hop and
>that (normally) AH/ESP are end-to-end.
In terms of addressing, RSVP is end-to-end in one
direction (sender->receiver) and hop-by-hop in the
other (receiver->sender).
>However, if one used (for example) AH with an asymmetric algorithm,
>one could perform hop-by-hop authentication of the
>packet with AH. This has obvious computational cost
>issues so might not be the best choice.
The packet payload is going to be modified at each hop,
as well, in both directions.
Melinda
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: [saag] Re:
- From: "Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig@mchp.siemens.de>
- References:
- Re:
- From: Derek Atkins <warlord@mit.edu>
- Re: [saag] Re:
- From: RJ Atkinson <rja@extremenetworks.com>