[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Two AES encryption modes?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Waterhouse," == Waterhouse, Richard <Richard.Waterhouse@GDC4S.Com> writes:
    Paul> I would like to bring up a 
    Paul> non-technical reason why we wouldn't: interoperability.

    Richard> In my humble opinion it should be a requiremnent on Son of IKE
    Richard> that it be able to negotiate Mode.

  Uh, they are really two different ciphers and should be treated like that.

  I'm pretty sure that we already decided that SOI would treat AES-128 and
AES-256 as two entirely different ciphers as well.
  No argument about combinatorics.

]    Internet Security. Have encryption, will travel           |1 Fish/2 Fish [
]  Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |Red F./Blow F [
]mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |strong crypto [
]    At the far end of some dark fiber - wait that's dirt!     |for everyone  [



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBPUAY4YqHRg3pndX9AQF1AQQAqftaYPWzkkAWbGz4fVC8MawYqOShsDpQ
+DH2++NlpxJq4q2fhZRNNFLC9Ausa9DVxX+4faelvbgfVzuJUrjdn3pnFKufkkwN
ri3XccbCjoD2UG7adpz7MZZs5Xwex1Gw82Zm87ZxEWZ2U5yAWJ8s50pWqPxZpdk0
+B+yB4lapxM=
=j52p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----