[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Two AES encryption modes?

To: ramana.yarlagadda@analog.com
Subject: Re: Two AES encryption modes?
From: Paul Koning <pkoning@equallogic.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2002 13:36:31 -0400
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
References: <4.3.2.7.1.20020726134302.00b6af00@golf.cpgdesign.analog.co m><5.1.0.14.2.20020726163827.033bc558@exna07.securitydynamics .com><4.3.2.7.1.20020726124924.00c4f830@golf.cpgdesign.analog.co m><5.1.0.14.2.20020726151631.02129768@exna07.securitydynamics .com><4.3.2.7.1.20020724125917.00e45bb0@golf.cpgdesign.analog.co m><p05111a31b9648aa81d06@[165.227.249.18]><200207241208.IAA02182@ietf.org><4.3.2.7.1.20020726151152.00db6b70@golf.cpgdesign.analog.com>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

>>>>> "Ramana" == Ramana Yarlagadda <ramana.yarlagadda@analog.com> writes:

 Ramana> Hi , Russ Yes , but what i am saying is CCM is using the NIST
 Ramana> approved algorithms as basic building blocks

Keep in mind that this doesn't in itself mean much.  It's possible to
build an insecure mode on top of a secure cipher -- or to use a mode
that can be secure incorrectly, thereby making it insecure.

     paul

References:
- Two AES encryption modes?
  - From: Paul Hoffman / VPNC <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
- I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-aes-ctr-00.txt
  - From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
- Re: Two AES encryption modes?
  - From: Ramana Yarlagadda <ramana.yarlagadda@analog.com>

Prev by Date: RE: draft-ietf-ipsec-ciph-aes-ctr-00.txt
Next by Date: Re: Two AES encryption modes?
Prev by thread: Re: Two AES encryption modes?
Next by thread: Re: Two AES encryption modes?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread