[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: SPD policy document/article

To: kent@bbn.com
Subject: Re: SPD policy document/article
From: "The Purple Streak, Hilarie Orman" <ho@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002 12:04:43 -0700
Cc: hardaker@tislabs.com, jis@mit.edu, smb@research.att.com, ipsec@lists.tislabs.com, lsanchez@xapiens.com
In-reply-to: Yourmessage <p05100301ba03f1dcfbc8@[128.89.88.34]>
Sender: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com

The work on the data model for PIBs and MIBs has resulted in defining
a greater level of detail about what it means to configure an IPsec
device.  It would be impossible to do the work without coming across
these issues.  However, this remains entirely consistent with RFC2401.

Hilarie

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SPD policy document/article
  - From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>

References:
- Re: SPD policy document/article
  - From: Stephen Kent <kent@bbn.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Counter Mode Security: Attacks, Storage & a Proposal
Next by Date: Re: SPD policy document/article
Prev by thread: Re: SPD policy document/article
Next by thread: Re: SPD policy document/article
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread