Re: ECN and issue 58

["Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>]

On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 08:14:01PM -0400, Black_David@emc.com wrote:
> Tero,
> 
> > The issue 58 is marked closed, but the section 2.24 is still there in
> > the draft-ietf-ipsec-ikev2-10.txt. I think we should remove the first
> > paragraph of the section, and simply say that we will do ECN as
> > specified in the RFC2401bis.
> 
> I'm a little uncomfortable with the wholesale removal of design
> explanation/rationale that would result.  As an alternative, would
> it be ok w/you if I whacked that first paragraph down to a fraction of
> its size (and took out some of the details) to focus on the important
> point (RFC2401bis encapsulation changes are "MUST use" in order to
> avoid breaking ECN)?

That seems like a good compromise.  Could you send some proposed text
to Charlie ASAP?  Many thanks!!

						- Ted