[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-ah-algorithms-00.txt
Sounds good to me.
Donald
===========================================================
Donald E. Eastlake III Donald.Eastlake@Motorola.com
Motorola Laboratories 1-508-786-7554 (work)
111 Locke Drive 1-508-634-2066 (home)
Marlboro, MA 01752 USA
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com [mailto:owner-ipsec@lists.tislabs.com] On Behalf Of Tero Kivinen
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 6:04 AM
To: Paul Hoffman / VPNC
Cc: ipsec@lists.tislabs.com
Subject: RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-ah-algorithms-00.txt
Paul Hoffman / VPNC writes:
> Instead, simply create a new section in this document that aligns
> with section 3.2.3 of draft-ietf-ipsec-esp-v3-06.txt, say that
> combined modes will require proper structuring of an ESP
> implementation, say why combined modes are useful (speed
> improvements, soon to be required in 802.11), and they say "there are
> no suggested or required algorithms at this time, but AES-CCM is
> expected to be of interest in the near future". That way,
> implementers know that even though there isn't a MUST or SHOULD right
> now, they still need to think about how their code should look if
> there is one in the future.
I really like that idea.
--
kivinen@iki.fi