[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[IPSECKEY] Re: comments request on IPSECKEY BOF description



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Massey <masseyd@ISI.EDU> writes:
    Dan> I just got off a plane so I'm still reading email in pieces...

    Dan> I'd like to suggest one minor very change in the agenda wording.
    Dan> The description captures the idea that the KEY record was restrcited
    Dan> so I think everyone agrees on the concepts, but the title "Why KEY is
    Dan> being obsoleted" struck me as a little off.   How about something
    Dan> more like:

    Dan> "Why KEY record subtypes were obsoleted."
    Dan> "Why the KEY record is no longer available to applications."
    Dan> "Why the KEY record was restricted to only DNSSEC keys."

  Good point.
  I like the last one.
  (I have a problem with "applications" - it is a relative term. )

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBPZ3f1YqHRg3pndX9AQE51AP/TfZk09JxVgJJrNhfgXAaNYunrwUdFmKl
EB+9iEIIX5krEkuZnfMNpi3Efej15yesgz4tMA36kZ8RLDcrtBm4N7ypsdDDJSZG
fqnreTpODAp2/kmPPkcPUXguX0mOUk+SQsxWp3H5s4BH68umPQ9AbxqZvQKOxY0D
0jwbhMz6L80=
=Rowh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
This is the IPSECKEY@sandelman.ca list.
Email to ipseckey-request@sandelman.ca to be removed.